Following the recent publication of a study in the Lancet (1) on Sudden Infant Death among bed-sharing babies and a subsequent meeting at the National Patient Safety Agency to consider guidance on bed-sharing, the UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative has issued the following statement:
In recognition of the fact that mother-infant bed-sharing appears to be associated with longer and more successful breastfeeding, the UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative has for some time been working to help health professionals enable breastfeeding mothers to share a bed with their baby whilst maintaining the safest possible environment. A sample bed-sharing policy has been developed for hospitals and a leaflet for parents produced with the Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths (FSID). Both documents are designed to promote safety while protecting breastfeeding, by educating health professionals and parents on the benefits and contra-indications to bed sharing and the safety issues related to it. UNICEF has also been urging NHS trusts to acknowledge the need to provide training for health professionals on all aspects of bed-sharing, including effective communication to parents of key messages appropriate to their needs and circumstances.
The Lancet paper suggested a slight increase in the risk of sudden infant death among babies of non-smoking mothers who bed-shared all night in the first eight weeks of life. This was followed by a large amount of publicity and media coverage advising against bed sharing.
At present, the UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative is unable to support blanket recommendations against bed sharing in the early weeks for the following reasons:
There is anecdotal evidence that health professionals may simply advise parents against bed sharing if they perceive it to be banned or discouraged at an institutional or national level. This means that parents are denied a full discussion about important topics such as the benefits, contraindications and safety issues. Parents may also be less likely to raise the subject for fear of disapproval. Nevertheless, recent research conducted in the UK (4) indicates that while all-night bed sharing is relatively unusual, it is very common for parents to take their baby into bed for shorter periods at night, particularly for breastfeeding, comforting and settling babies.
It is therefore essential that the benefits, risks and alternatives to bed sharing are carefully weighed and that parents be given full information appropriate to their needs in order to encourage safe practice and to protect breastfeeding. The UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative recommends that:
UNICEF recommends that discussions with parents about bed sharing should address the following factors:
UNICEF has suggested to the Royal College of Midwives and the Community Practitioners' and Health Visitors' Association that talks continue to ensure that adequate guidance on bed sharing be available to health professionals, including the issue of effective risk assessment for all mothers and babies.
All interested parties have agreed that the joint UNICEF/FSID leaflet 'Sharing a bed with your baby' provides clear, comprehensive and evidence-based information for parents and that it should continue to be used. UNICEF will continue to monitor research developments to ensure that the leaflet remains evidence-based.
UNICEF further recommends that all future research into infant death and sleeping environments should unambiguously record data on all important factors, which must include the baby's sleep surface, maternal and paternal smoking status, alcohol and drug consumption and infant feeding method. These factors should be recorded at the time of infant death (rather than relying on data for other periods such as feeding method at delivery or smoking status during pregnancy) and the results should be adjusted to control for them.
1. Carpenter RG et al (2004). Sudden unexplained infant death in 20 regions in Europe: case control study. Lancet 363: 185-91 [Full text]
2. Standing Committee on Nutrition of the British Paediatric Association (1994). Is breastfeeding beneficial in the UK? Arch Dis Child 71: 376-380.
3. Horne RSC et al (2004). Comparison of evoked arousability in breast and formula fed infants. Arch. Dis. Child 89: 22-25 [Abstract]
4. Blair PS, Ball HL (2004). The prevalence and characteristics associated with parent-infant bed-sharing in England. Arch Dis Child. in press.
Footnote, 14 May 2004
The Lancet article defines mothers as 'non-smoking' if they did not smoke during pregnancy. Data is apparently incomplete for smoking status around the time of death. This means that mothers who quit during pregnancy but re-started smoking after delivery were defined as non-smokers in the study.
Other studies suggest that around 40% of smokers may quit during pregnancy, but that between 40% and 70% of these mothers will re-start smoking in the weeks or months following the birth of their babies.
Carmichael SL, Ahluwalia IB (2000). Correlates of postpartum smoking relapse. Results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Am J Prev Med. 19:193-6 [Abstract]
Fingerhut LA et al (1990). Smoking before, during, and after pregnancy. Am J Pub Health 80: 541-544 [Abstract]
Mullen PD et al (1990). Maintenance of nonsmoking postpartum by women who stopped smoking during pregnancy. Am J Pub Health 80: 992-994 [Abstract]
McBride CM, Pirie PL (1990). Postpartum smoking relapse. Addict Behav. 15:165-8 [Abstract]
McBride CM, Pirie PL, Curry SJ (1992). Postpartum relapse to smoking: a prospective study. Health Educ Res 7:381-90 [Abstract]